I've conducted another NB test and collected a new data point for my AeT: 158 bpm. With this new data point, I want to update my estimate for my unknown average AeT. But first, a note: while in my first NB test I used the average heart rate of a 30-minute run in which I could breathe comfortably through my nose, in my second test I measured it a bit differently: it was the maximum heart rate I could sustain at which I could comfortably breathe through my nose for a few minutes at a time. On multiple occasions, I purposefully increased my pace to see the heart rate at which I needed to open my mouth for air. Though I conducted this NB test slightly differently, I am already accounting for uncertainty in AeT measurements by using Bayesian modeling; specifically, in the previous page I assumed a standard deviation of 5 bpm for these measurements. I can then use a conservative estimate for my AeT (e.g., the lower 10% quantile), and define my Zone 2 using this number. I am therefore not concerned about my results being influenced by changing my measurement protocol, because I am already properly accounting for uncertainty in these measurements and choosing conservative estimates for my AeT.
With multiple data points, the math for the posterior distribution changes a bit. Recall the prior distribution of my average AeT:
We describe the likelihood of observing a number of heart rates using the nose-breathing test (denoted y(i)NB for i=1,...,n) conditional on a true but unknown average AeT value similarly as before, but for convenience we will assume the standard deviation is the same as that of the AeT:
What we want is the distribution of AeT|y(i)NB; that is, the distribution of my average AeT given the data points I've collected using the nose-breathing test. The math is skipped, but the posterior distribution of AeT given the data points is
Plugging in our numbers, we get
This page is here to illustrate that as I keep collecting measurements, the posterior distribution will keep narrowing. However, I now have a better idea of my AeT based on the nose-breathing test, and I won't continue to measure it this way. I will perform endurance training using 140 at my AeT. I have ordered a lactate testing kit, which will allow me to collect more data, do different modeling, and get a more precise estimate of my AeT.